季度考核表的英文自我评价怎么写呢？我们一起来看一看：
1、季度考核表英文自我评价首先可以写自己的工作内容、工作职责；2、接着可以写季度考核表的成绩；3、然后可以写对自己的评价及在工作过程中的所获所思所感；4、最后结尾部分写自己今后努力的方向以及对未来的职业规划。
季度考核表的英文自我评价篇一
Key to Performance Performance: Self - Assessment and Objectives.Performance work is an important part of enterprise HR work. The key to the following two points: First, give employees the opportunity to self-assessment; the second is to make the staff's goals and the company's goals are consistent.
Give employees the opportunity to self-assess
First, the employee's self-assessment as part of the company's performance appraisal process, is very important. To encourage employees to participate in the company's performance appraisal process and ensure an effective dialogue between managers and employees, you can use the same form in the company's regular performance review process, or create a slightly modified version.
Second, the purpose of employee self-assessment is to obtain employees on their performance of self-point of view. This is a powerful way to give employees the opportunity to speak throughout the performance appraisal process. Sometimes, managers worry about the value of self-assessment, that employees will simply give their praise and higher ratings in order to try to raise their actual rating. Experience has shown that the opposite trend is real, and when we evaluate ourselves, we tend to be more severe than others.
Third, the manager's personal view of the employee, self-assessment is a very valuable way for the company to get more information about employee performance. It can also help managers stay ready to deal with differences in opinion or opinion and gain insight into employee expectations.
So that the objectives of the staff consistent with the company's goals
The importance of creating a SMART (concrete, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) goal is to associate the employee's goals with higher-level organizational goals, and you create for employees' This is a very important "context." This helps employees understand why their work is important and how their work contributes to the success of the organization as a whole.
Practice has proved that the goal of the staff with a higher level of departmental goals, the objectives of the branch and the goal of the entire enterprise linked to create a personal goal and organizational goals consistent with the "big environment" for the development of staff performance is crucial Important, but also allow employees to feel that their work is very important.
季度考核表的英文自我评价篇二
In many enterprises performance appraisal, there is a "staff self-assessment" link, which is the first employee of their performance in the assessment period, and then submitted to the direct superior to adjust, and finally draw the employee's performance scores. In the use of direct superior performance evaluation system, the purpose of employee self-assessment is nothing more than two: 1, the fastest quantitative data sources can be quantified; 2, reflects the staff participation in performance appraisal; However, if the assessment of employees Assessment without a clear understanding of it, it will lead to significant deviation of the assessment results, or even failure. We know that the performance appraisal may be a variety of errors, such as the different leaders of different personal scales, the average tendency, etc., then the self-assessment link, which led to the factors that lead to errors it?
First, the personality of each person is different from the self-assessment scale is very different. For example, some employees self-confidence, their own evaluation of high, some people feel inferior, their evaluation on the low side. In addition, some people pursue perfection, strict requirements on their own, and some others have passed, these two categories of people to their own scale certainly different. Also, some old employees of the company and colleagues know very clearly, scoring when its capability, and new employees do not know other people's shallow depth, to their scoring when there is not much reference to speak of.
Second, psychological research shows that most people are overconfident."Do not make a normal fool," an example of this book mentioned that we often hear a lot of people say that they "not on the phase", that is, according to the photos did not look good. In fact, the photo is an objective reflection of our appearance, and each of us in the mirror when it will be special (and may be unconscious or habitual) to choose the best angle, that is more than a layer of subjective Factors in it, which led to our look in the mirror look better than the photos. So in fact, the staff part of the self-assessment on the provision of such a "mirror" to our staff to the beauty, this error which is self-evident.
Third, the staff self-assessment of the score, the assessment will do a great impact on the scoring. Have the experience of "bargain" people know that if you see the stall on a package, and my heart that probably worth 100, but the mouth asking price, the boss said 500, if you really want this package, bigMost people only dare to 300 or 400 pieces to cut. This is the so-called "anchor effect", the negotiation inside the "first offer, without anger in each other's situation, the higher the better" is the meaning, because the first bid will greatly grasp the initiative, so that the other psychological expectationsResulting in great changes. Employee self-assessment actually gave the examiner a chance to take the lead in the bidder, and whether the assessment due to face or other considerations, are likely to be the "quote" effect, so that the assessment results error. We in the actual work of human resources, but also did find this phenomenon, a company several departments staff performance appraisal scores, without exception, no less than its self-rated scores.
Based on the above analysis, we will find that the department leaders get the self-evaluation scores mixed with too many subjective factors, so that can not be filtered through technical means, and this score will have a great impact on the assessment; Confident employees have a high score, and sometimes due to the need for mandatory distribution, those who require their own strict, scoring low staff has become a victim, because their scoring low, the final score is difficult to be brought up leadership. In the assessment of the indicators can not quantify the more components, or different departments in different parts of the work of employees, the lack of uniform measure of the time, this situation is particularly serious.
So, companies in the performance evaluation of the actual operation, how to solve these problems I mentioned above? Many people may be from the "increase the proportion of quantifiable indicators," "to strengthen the assessment and assessment of those who training, But in practice, it will only increase the workload and complexity of performance appraisal, implementation easier said than done? In fact, just look back to see the implementation of the two purposes of self-evaluation .Self-evaluation and implementation of self-evaluation, , We will find a simple solution: the relatively objective quantifiable indicators, the implementation of "employee self-evaluation", while maintaining a "fast data source" - in fact only data sources, but also embodied in the form "Employee participation"; and not to quantify the subjective evaluation of indicators, the assessment by the direct scoring, do not give employees self-evaluation (and thus in this link error) opportunity.
We know that performance appraisal in human resources work is a huge project, the implementation of the highest cost, companies should seize the main contradiction, step by step, and in the initial stage, but not for the form of trapped. So is slightly Jun policy for some enterprises initially set up performance management system, simply cancel the self-evaluation session, thus avoiding the link error, but also to a certain extent reduce the workload and complexity of the assessment for the next Step smooth implementation of the well prepared.
Of course, the front said that the main business in the initial stage of performance management situation. When companies meet the following conditions: First, the implementation of the more smooth performance management, implementation costs can be effectively controlled; Second, the formation of a good performance within the company culture, we understand the performance management is more uniform, their own evaluation More objective; Third, the department leaders generally have a clear understanding of the lower levels and independent judgments; we can think that enterprises have entered the advanced stage. At this point to carry out a real staff self-assessment, it will further mobilize the enthusiasm of employees and the importance of performance, thus forming a virtuous circle of performance management.
In summary, the core issue of employee self-evaluation, not how to do a good job, but when to engage in, when should not engage in the problem. It is necessary to distinguish the stage of development of enterprise performance management and select the key points that should be solved at each stage, and will not achieve the multiplier effect without being trapped in form. From the initial stage of performance management to the advanced stage, each enterprise has a long way to go, and this process can not be achieved overnight.